Inspired by Jew or Not Jew.

Post your reviews of WINNER or not WINNER things using this rating scale:

0	1	2	3	4	5

Sample review:

I revoke my right to be a member of this community



Why does this even need to be reviewed? It's probably LOSER, isn't it?

Verdict: LOSER

I-1	O-0	V-2

I is internal WINNER, O is how WINNER it appears, and V is how much WINNERness is/would be valued for that thing being reviewed.



A 5,000 Rigcoin prize goes to the first one who can identify all 6 ranking images and send the identifications to me in PM.

what

what

Simply a different perception on rating things as  or  .

You have internal WINNER (I), apparent WINNER (O), and WINNER value (V).

Something with a V-0 is something you would be disgusted if it were WINNER or you resent that it counts as WINNER, a V-5 means you either wish for it to be WINNER or love the fact that it's WINNER.

Alex Navarro is probably a perfect 0. He scores as I-0, O-0, and V-0.

I can't count the myriad of ways that site is dumb.



Is it your webpage?

 

I am impressed by how much effort you put into your post

I am impressed by how much effort you put into your post

Same here, lol.  Even though he stole many of the ideas from another website, the well-presented miniscule pictures and elaborate scoring system does warrant some credit.

thats a lot of work for a really dumb thing

Quote from: Cirus on 08-03-2014, 12:50:16 PM

I am impressed by how much effort you put into your post

Same here, lol.  Even though he stole many of the ideas from another website, the well-presented miniscule pictures and elaborate scoring system does warrant some credit.

I posted the site it was taken from. But this is just a different way of winner rating.