Quote from: X23 on 03-09-2007, 20:52:45 PMQuote from: Dissident on 03-09-2007, 20:47:48 PMthis video appeals to FURRIESare you a FURRY X23? poo poo. Wait a second. No. I didn't even see that. God damnit. I hate Furries because of this. Anything anthromorphic is furry now. Why do those non-hetrosexual person furrys exist??? This song was made before furries. Furries weren't around in the 80s. When this song was made they had no clue you have to understand. They're obviously humans wearing masks anyway.furries were around back then, and these guys were an example of itjust because something doesn't have a clearly defined term in our languages doesn't mean it doesn't existgravity existed before we defined itand you basically just said that you like furry poo poo, just because it makes you angry that they are lumped in with furries doesn't make liking it ok
Quote from: Dissident on 03-09-2007, 20:47:48 PMthis video appeals to FURRIESare you a FURRY X23? poo poo. Wait a second. No. I didn't even see that. God damnit. I hate Furries because of this. Anything anthromorphic is furry now. Why do those non-hetrosexual person furrys exist??? This song was made before furries. Furries weren't around in the 80s. When this song was made they had no clue you have to understand. They're obviously humans wearing masks anyway.
this video appeals to FURRIESare you a FURRY X23?
Quote from: SOS-Dan on 03-09-2007, 21:01:53 PMQuote from: X23 on 03-09-2007, 20:52:45 PMQuote from: Dissident on 03-09-2007, 20:47:48 PMthis video appeals to FURRIESare you a FURRY X23? poo poo. Wait a second. No. I didn't even see that. God damnit. I hate Furries because of this. Anything anthromorphic is furry now. Why do those non-hetrosexual person furrys exist??? This song was made before furries. Furries weren't around in the 80s. When this song was made they had no clue you have to understand. They're obviously humans wearing masks anyway.furries were around back then, and these guys were an example of itjust because something doesn't have a clearly defined term in our languages doesn't mean it doesn't existgravity existed before we defined itand you basically just said that you like furry poo poo, just because it makes you angry that they are lumped in with furries doesn't make liking it okNo, furry was something created. No one was attracted to Anthromorphic animals until the late 90s. These guys weren't furry. Anthromorphic animals were around, but it was different from now because nobody was attracted to them. Gravity is different. Furry is a phenomenon that did not happen until the late 90s. It came with the internet. It wasn't something natural like Gravity, or a disease or w/e you'd name. I basically didn't say I liked furry poo poo.
Quote from: X23 on 03-09-2007, 21:07:57 PMQuote from: SOS-Dan on 03-09-2007, 21:01:53 PMQuote from: X23 on 03-09-2007, 20:52:45 PMQuote from: Dissident on 03-09-2007, 20:47:48 PMthis video appeals to FURRIESare you a FURRY X23? poo poo. Wait a second. No. I didn't even see that. God damnit. I hate Furries because of this. Anything anthromorphic is furry now. Why do those non-hetrosexual person furrys exist??? This song was made before furries. Furries weren't around in the 80s. When this song was made they had no clue you have to understand. They're obviously humans wearing masks anyway.furries were around back then, and these guys were an example of itjust because something doesn't have a clearly defined term in our languages doesn't mean it doesn't existgravity existed before we defined itand you basically just said that you like furry poo poo, just because it makes you angry that they are lumped in with furries doesn't make liking it okNo, furry was something created. No one was attracted to Anthromorphic animals until the late 90s. These guys weren't furry. Anthromorphic animals were around, but it was different from now because nobody was attracted to them. Gravity is different. Furry is a phenomenon that did not happen until the late 90s. It came with the internet. It wasn't something natural like Gravity, or a disease or w/e you'd name. I basically didn't say I liked furry poo poo.xDthat was the most retarded thing i've read in a whilefirst off people did love furries before the ninetiesperhaps you are familiar with the jaguar warriors of the ancient aztec empire. when they killed a jaguar they would take the pelt and wear it over their body, in hopes of becoming a jaguar themselves. that is the definition of a furry right there.and the fact that you are defending this so vehemently is a clear indicator of how much you like this furry vid, that being a lot
anyone who dons a piece of clothing with the intent to look like an animal is a furry. And the only reason it appears that furries appeared around the 90s was the internet and the coming out of thousands of furry scum onto said internet where they could maintain anonimity while being sick fetchs. They were still furries before that, but they couldn't be open about it.
Quote from: Dissident on 03-09-2007, 21:18:36 PManyone who dons a piece of clothing with the intent to look like an animal is a furry. And the only reason it appears that furries appeared around the 90s was the internet and the coming out of thousands of furry scum onto said internet where they could maintain anonimity while being sick fetchs. They were still furries before that, but they couldn't be open about it.But it's a chicken-egg situation. The furries couldn't become furries without the furry specific art, but for the furry specific art there would need to be furries. What came first? Also, donning clothing to look like an animal is too broad of a definition. Many nonfurries have done that. Furry implies they are attracted to anthromorphic animals. And ones of the specific retarded furry art type.
Quote from: X23 on 03-09-2007, 21:23:17 PMQuote from: Dissident on 03-09-2007, 21:18:36 PManyone who dons a piece of clothing with the intent to look like an animal is a furry. And the only reason it appears that furries appeared around the 90s was the internet and the coming out of thousands of furry scum onto said internet where they could maintain anonimity while being sick fetchs. They were still furries before that, but they couldn't be open about it.But it's a chicken-egg situation. The furries couldn't become furries without the furry specific art, but for the furry specific art there would need to be furries. What came first? the fact that you don't know what a furry is really makes your point moot.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandomread it and hopefully you will understand how furry this video is and desert it
Quote from: Dissident on 03-09-2007, 21:18:36 PManyone who dons a piece of clothing with the intent to look like an animal is a furry. And the only reason it appears that furries appeared around the 90s was the internet and the coming out of thousands of furry scum onto said internet where they could maintain anonimity while being sick fetchs. They were still furries before that, but they couldn't be open about it.But it's a chicken-egg situation. The furries couldn't become furries without the furry specific art, but for the furry specific art there would need to be furries. What came first?
Quote from: SOS-Dan on 03-09-2007, 21:24:58 PMQuote from: X23 on 03-09-2007, 21:23:17 PMQuote from: Dissident on 03-09-2007, 21:18:36 PManyone who dons a piece of clothing with the intent to look like an animal is a furry. And the only reason it appears that furries appeared around the 90s was the internet and the coming out of thousands of furry scum onto said internet where they could maintain anonimity while being sick fetchs. They were still furries before that, but they couldn't be open about it.But it's a chicken-egg situation. The furries couldn't become furries without the furry specific art, but for the furry specific art there would need to be furries. What came first? Also, donning clothing to look like an animal is too broad of a definition. Many nonfurries have done that. Furry implies they are attracted to anthromorphic animals. And ones of the specific retarded furry art type.the fact that you don't know what a furry is really makes your point moot.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandomread it and hopefully you will understand how furry this video is and desert itThat article seals the deal on my position.
Quote from: X23 on 03-09-2007, 21:23:17 PMQuote from: Dissident on 03-09-2007, 21:18:36 PManyone who dons a piece of clothing with the intent to look like an animal is a furry. And the only reason it appears that furries appeared around the 90s was the internet and the coming out of thousands of furry scum onto said internet where they could maintain anonimity while being sick fetchs. They were still furries before that, but they couldn't be open about it.But it's a chicken-egg situation. The furries couldn't become furries without the furry specific art, but for the furry specific art there would need to be furries. What came first? Also, donning clothing to look like an animal is too broad of a definition. Many nonfurries have done that. Furry implies they are attracted to anthromorphic animals. And ones of the specific retarded furry art type.the fact that you don't know what a furry is really makes your point moot.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandomread it and hopefully you will understand how furry this video is and desert it
Quote from: X23 on 03-09-2007, 21:26:07 PMQuote from: SOS-Dan on 03-09-2007, 21:24:58 PMQuote from: X23 on 03-09-2007, 21:23:17 PMQuote from: Dissident on 03-09-2007, 21:18:36 PManyone who dons a piece of clothing with the intent to look like an animal is a furry. And the only reason it appears that furries appeared around the 90s was the internet and the coming out of thousands of furry scum onto said internet where they could maintain anonimity while being sick fetchs. They were still furries before that, but they couldn't be open about it.But it's a chicken-egg situation. The furries couldn't become furries without the furry specific art, but for the furry specific art there would need to be furries. What came first? Also, donning clothing to look like an animal is too broad of a definition. Many nonfurries have done that. Furry implies they are attracted to anthromorphic animals. And ones of the specific retarded furry art type.the fact that you don't know what a furry is really makes your point moot.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandomread it and hopefully you will understand how furry this video is and desert itThat article seals the deal on my position.perhaps you didn't read itallow me to quote it"Examples of anthropomorphism in the furry fandom include the attribution of human intelligence, facial expressions, and often anatomy, speech, bipedalism, and the wearing of clothes"when they wear those furry masks they are attributing human characteristics to those animal mask, which is the exact definition of a furryapparently you can't read correctly either, i see no reason why any of us should believe anything you say
Quote from: SOS-Dan on 03-09-2007, 21:28:56 PMQuote from: X23 on 03-09-2007, 21:26:07 PMQuote from: SOS-Dan on 03-09-2007, 21:24:58 PMQuote from: X23 on 03-09-2007, 21:23:17 PMQuote from: Dissident on 03-09-2007, 21:18:36 PManyone who dons a piece of clothing with the intent to look like an animal is a furry. And the only reason it appears that furries appeared around the 90s was the internet and the coming out of thousands of furry scum onto said internet where they could maintain anonimity while being sick fetchs. They were still furries before that, but they couldn't be open about it.But it's a chicken-egg situation. The furries couldn't become furries without the furry specific art, but for the furry specific art there would need to be furries. What came first? Also, donning clothing to look like an animal is too broad of a definition. Many nonfurries have done that. Furry implies they are attracted to anthromorphic animals. And ones of the specific retarded furry art type.the fact that you don't know what a furry is really makes your point moot.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandomread it and hopefully you will understand how furry this video is and desert itThat article seals the deal on my position.perhaps you didn't read itallow me to quote it"Examples of anthropomorphism in the furry fandom include the attribution of human intelligence, facial expressions, and often anatomy, speech, bipedalism, and the wearing of clothes"when they wear those furry masks they are attributing human characteristics to those animal mask, which is the exact definition of a furryapparently you can't read correctly either, i see no reason why any of us should believe anything you sayUm, thats only an example of anthromorphism. Not furry. Maybe YOU can't read correctly, and I see no reason why we should believe what you say.These guys didn't know furry, and if they did it might have affected the video. I'm sure they thought they were just taking part in a psychadelic music video, and not dressing up as anthro animals.And if we admit this video to be furry, we're giving the furries what they want. They want attention. Instead, if we look at the video as we were if we didn't know about furries, we'll effectively fight them. Who knows, maybe some guest might of saw the video, thought nothing, and than saw you guys talking about furries. He checks it out, and becomes a furry because you guys have to talk about non obvious things being furries.Sure this video seems furry, but thats what the furries want to do. They want to ingraine themselves in to your mind. They succeeded. You know about furries. They don't care if you hate them either. They're inhuman intention seekers.
Whats with all the Furry talk?
Quote from: pimpofdoom on 03-09-2007, 22:41:29 PMWhats with all the Furry talk?They're being dumb non-heterosexual persongots because the video has people with mole masks.